•1 min read•from Machine Learning
[D] NeurIPS 2026 Submission
Hey,
I have a paper on ArXiV that I am splitting into two. I want to send the first part to NeurIPS; however, I am scared that reviewers will say that it is incremental research, given my paper on ArXiV. I am going to change the title and framing of the paper, so I feel like this may be a real risk. Does anyone know if it is actually a reasonable doubt? Has anyone experienced something similar?
[link] [comments]
Want to read more?
Check out the full article on the original site
Tagged with
#rows.com
#real-time data collaboration
#real-time collaboration
#NeurIPS
#submission
#paper
#incremental research
#ArXiV
#reviewers
#risk
#title
#research
#reasonable doubt
#framing
#experience
#submissions
#first part
#split
#machine learning
#community